Nelson Mandela had reportedly condemned former US President George W Bush as a "small man" who was seeking to dominate the world over his decision to invade Iraq, adding that his decision of deposing Saddam Hussein was not because of a massive stockpile of weapons of mass destruction , but because he wanted to tap into Iraq's oil reserves.
According to the Telegraph, the South African freedom fighter-turned-world leader is said to have believed strongly in the West as a force for good and felt betrayed by Bush''s unilateral grandstanding, and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair''s support for it.
In 2003, when the decision was taken to invade the country without the backing of the UN, Mandela, a Nobel Peace Laureate, reportedly called Peter Hain, the then Welsh Secretary and former anti-apartheidactivist, to "breathe fire" about it.
Hain said that Mandela expressed his strong dislike for the US leader when the two men met shortly after the Iraq invasion.
"He described George Bush as a small man. He felt very strongly about the way the Bush presidency was seeking to dominate the world. He felt dismay and sadness about the decision of two countries to which he felt very close," the paper quoted Hain, as saying.
"He is part of a generation that looked very much to the West, that saw the Westminster parliament as the mother of parliaments, Britain as a force for good in the world along with America and he felt betrayed," he added.
The revelation came shortly after the launch of Bush''s book, Desicion Points (his spelling) in which he has stressed that his decision to invade Iraq was right, and that "no one was more shocked or angry" than him that WMD's were not found. A few dead and diseased and bereaved and homeless Iraqis might be a bit more angry - just one of the inaccuracies in Desicion Points.
O my poor Kingdom, Sick with civil blows Peopled with WOLVES, Thy old inhabitants...
11/13/2010
Iraqi Deal Damaging To Democracy
"The Shiite-Sunni power struggle has now been transplanted into the government and potentially institutionalized. Maliki and Allawi are bound together in deep, personal enmity for one another. That will make governing that much more difficult." "The core question is now how much decision-making authority Allawi's new council will have and thus how much he will be able to check the prime minister's extensive power. Allawi must now grab control of those parts of Iraqi security forces that Maliki took under his wing during his first term. Those who remember just how ruthless the prime minister was will not be overcome by optimism." Various German media takes here.
Wolves In The City take : welcome to the Shiaocracy and a secular, Iran-orchestrated debacle. Thanks, Dubya. Freedom, eh?
11/11/2010
Crime And Punishment In Iraq And Elsewhere
From Raskolnikov's Dream Sequence (Crime and Punishment - Dostoevsky):
11/10/2010
Anti-Muslim Sentiment In The US
![]() |
| US Election Poster |
There is a growing concern over civil rights abuses of Muslims, including unlawful arrests, detention and violence -- especially against those in prison.
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace recently held a forum in Washington DC addressing these concerns.
Professor John Esposito of Georgetown University, a speaker at the forum, told Press TV, "You will find lawyers of every possible background, basically saying it is very difficult for a Muslim accused in our society to get a fair trial.”
British Interrogators Face War Crimes Probe
Any prosecutions would be almost unprecedented. In 2006, one British soldier pleaded guilty to a war crime charge arising out of his mistreatment of Baha Mousa, the Iraqi hotel receptionist who was tortured to death by British troops in Basra three years earlier. He was jailed for a year and expelled from the army. Six of his comrades were cleared of a number of serious charges. No other member of the British armed forces has ever been convicted of a war crime.
Faced with the possibility of more servicemen being accused of war crimes, MoD officials have been increasingly 'concerned' in recent days about the damaging effect such charges would have upon the 'morale and reputation' of the services (oh yes?).
The MoD has been unable to explain why the films were made, or why training material used to instruct would-be interrogators in techniques that appear to breach the Geneva conventions was not disclosed to the court.
11/09/2010
Saved By Torture. Thanks, Dubya
From Dubya's Memoir
''Three people were waterboarded and I believe that decision saved lives,” he wrote. “Their interrogations helped break up plots to attack American diplomatic facilities abroad, Heathrow airport and Canary Wharf, and multiple targets in the United States.”
Mr Bush provided no further details of the alleged intended attacks, and it was not clear whether their supposed ringleaders were ever brought to justice. Neither did he address the fact that waterboarding did nothing to prevent the bombings in London on 7 July 2005.
Almost two years since he left the White House as one of the least-loved presidents of modern times, the book he is promoting promises to be |America’s publishing event of 2010. In an interview to publicise the memoir, Decision Points, Mr Bush reasserted his belief that waterboarding did not amount to torture. Asked if it was ever used on the captured al-Qa’ida leader Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he told The Times: “Damn right!”
Condemnations of this lunacy are already ringing all over the world. More here.
11/08/2010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





