Obama Speaks To His Allies In The Middle East |
That, though, wasn't what was principally repugnant in Obama's speech. Nor should we begrudge him the cruel nonsense about his hopes for the future of the country the Coalition have crippled if not destroyed. No, what was truly indefensible was his Orwellian whitewash of the war itself. A few caveats aside, this was the speech that Bush himself might have given had he still been in office. For example -
Iraq was, "a war to disarm a state [that] became a fight against an insurgency."
Eh? The Bush rationale for the war was that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction that threatened the world. Those weapons, of course, did not exist, and the assertion that they did, as Dick Cheney acknowledged, was no more than a pretext for a war being waged in pursuit of regional hegemony and resource control. In other words, if Hussein's WMD had not existed they would have been invented - and, guess what, they were. No more cynical a remark may ever have been made by a ranking public official. Yet here was Obama giving the imprimatur of his presidency to the myth of WMD, thus offering it as the official executive version of the war.
The point is a legally as well as morally critical one. If Hussein did not palbably threaten us or possess the capacity to do so, and if responsible parties in the Bush administration knew this to be the case, then we had no casus belli, and the invasion of Iraq was a war of aggression as defined in the Nuremberg Code and a wide body of international law. Notoriously, Bush, Blair and their minions have escaped not only judgment but proper investigation for the Iraq war (and much else) under the Obama administration.
Obama went on to say, that US troops "fought in a faraway place for people they never knew. They stared into the darkest of human creations - war - and helped the Iraqi people seek the light of peace."
Orwell's Big Brother might have blushed at that.
Excellent
ReplyDeleteOf course it was an illegal war. I was chastised for calling it that from the beginning.
This was the example that Cheney wanted to get across with his 1% solution. The attack on Iraq was just that. AN ATTACK.
It was always about Iraq. Never about OBL, DEMOCRACY, FREEDOM, A/Q/, OR ANY OF THAT OTHER NONSENSE.
As if our sanctions against Iraq during the Clinton regime did not kill enough children.
PNAC, W, Cheney, Rummy, and the rest of the NEO/ZIO/CONS were itching to go into Iraq from the beginning.
Billions, upon billions, upon billions of dollars were made.
These elite scum bags do not care if innocent people die.
Just as long as they get their share of the pie.
BTW. The run up to the war really gets me hot.
ReplyDeleteAgain it demonstrates how easy it is to manipulate the masses.
Yes, the run up was where they lost me. The rest didn't even surprise me. The new Labour Party leader, Ed Milliband, elected here yesterday was elected over his brother, David, a Blair clone. He was an opponent of the war. This is actually the reason he shaded the election.This is interesting for the UK since he has cut the cord with Blair and Brown and the neocons. Perhaps he will be a progressive influence. He is young and could appeal to a younger constituency. But we have all been conned before. False flags as you say yourself.
ReplyDeleteI saw that yesterday.
ReplyDeleteThe two brothers hugging. Very touching. :-)
'A progressive influence' We need more than an influence.
I am hoping that the world stops, looks back and sees the Neocon folly for what it was.
Unfortunately we as a species seem to make the same mistakes over and over again.
Or, are they really mistakes?
I think not.
You are more of a sceptic than me, RZ. That is saying a lot. Bedtime here, my friend. Tomorrow a new dawn. :>)
ReplyDeleteAs far as skeptic goes.
ReplyDeleteWell I try my best.:-)
" A new dawn"
That is what the big O has renamed the war plan for Iraq. LOL
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz