11/30/2010

Iraq Has Most Disappeared Persons In The World


forced disappearance (or enforced disappearance) is defined in Article 2 of the Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly On 20 December 2006, as the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by agents of the State or by persons or groups of persons acting with the authorization, support or acquiescence of the State, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law. Often forced disappearance implies murder. The victim in such a case is first abducted, then illegally detained, and often tortured; the victim is then killed, and the body is then hidden. Typically, a murder will be surreptitious, with the corpse disposed of in such a way as to prevent it ever being found, so that the person apparently vanishes. The party committing the murder has deniability, as there is no body to prove that the victim has actually died.
[1]
 Article 1 of the Convention further states that No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification for enforced disappearance.
[2]
Neither Iraq, nor the USA have signed or ratified this convention.
[3]
The United States refused to sign, saying that the text "did not meet our expectations", without giving an explanation.
[4]
Once again the United States placed itself outside the provisions of International Humanitarian law.
According to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which came into force on 1 July 2002, when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed at any civilian population, a "forced disappearance" qualifies as a crime against humanity, and thus is not subject to a statute of limitations.

5 comments:

  1. What went/is going on in Iraq is beyond human comprehension.
    The world is treating this as if it is not even happening.
    Did they use Iraq as a test tube for future wars, and occupations.
    If what went on in Iraq is not genocide then I do not know what the eff is.
    It was real time ethnic cleansing along with genocide.
    And yet the West wonders why al-Sadr and others have the power and the faith of the people.
    The killing fields of Iraq stand against everything that Islam stands for.

    I suppose occupations will do that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel it is receding from the US consciousness, RZ. That won't happen here because of the anger against Blair and Brown for selling our interests to Bush and the Pentagon. The embassy cables are shedding more light on this even as we type.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Americans have never been known for having any kind of a memory span.
    What? What was that? What was that you said?
    I need a little more time to disect these leaks.
    i have been watching where my hits come from and where they are going.
    Kuwait, Saudi, Egypt, and even Kazakhstan are going wild.

    I am also trying to figure out what impact if any this will have on the Koreas. I saw that the guy from the Guardian said the best is yet to come. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. If Rusbridger said that, then the best is indeed yet to come. A good one emerging tonight is Britain's craven undertaking to cover America's ass in the Iraq Inquiry being held here. David Miliband, whos grubby fingerprints are all over this, almost became leader of the Labour Party. God help us.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think it will be something in the form of the U.S. giving [some one] the green light. [Israel>/Lebanon/>Gaza/]

    Just like when April Glaspie Papa Bush's ambassador told Sadam.
    Your problem with Kuwait is your problem, not our problem.
    Basically giving Sadam the green light to attack Kuwait.

    ReplyDelete